Data sources and inclusion rules
Where the records come from, how cases are identified and checked, and what the dataset covers.
- Status
- Current
- Version
- 1.0
- Date
- October 10, 2026
Methods entries document how EWRL research is produced. Findings and conclusions appear in the Reports and Evidence Base collections.
On this page
What the dataset covers
The Edged-Weapon Response Lab dataset records fatal police encounters in the United States that involved an edged weapon, from January 2015 through December 2024. It currently holds 1,970 records. Each record represents one decedent and one fatal encounter; no incident in the dataset involved multiple decedents.
Source databases
Case identification begins with two publicly available databases maintained by independent organizations:
Washington Post Fatal Force records every person fatally shot by an on-duty police officer in the United States since 2015. The database is continuously updated and draws on news reporting, public records, and official data. (Washington Post, 2025)
Mapping Police Violence compiles fatal encounters with police from multiple independent sources, including media reports, legal settlements, and government records. (Mapping Police Violence, 2026)
The Lab does not republish these databases and does not alter their records. Readers who need case-level details should consult those sources directly.
How edged-weapon cases are identified
Each source database was filtered to the study period (January 1, 2015 – December 31, 2024) and then processed identically.
From the Washington Post (10,430 total fatalities in the study period):
- Excluded as unarmed: 565 records
- Excluded — weapon outside the edged-weapon definition: 6,859 records
- Retained — explicitly coded as edged-weapon involved: 1,802 records
- Individually reviewed — ambiguous or missing weapon classification: 1,204 records, yielding 180 additional qualifying cases
- Washington Post qualifying records: 1,982
From Mapping Police Violence (11,523 total in the study period):
- Same procedure applied; 26 additional cases verified from the ambiguous pool
- Mapping Police Violence qualifying records: 1,971
Individual review of ambiguous records uses the decedent’s name, city, state, and open-source reporting to confirm or exclude the case.
Deduplication
The two source lists were merged (N = 3,953 combined qualifying records) and deduplicated on decedent name, date, and location, reducing the combined list to 1,996 unique cases.
A case-by-case verification pass then removed 26 records that did not meet the operational definition on closer examination — for example, a knife-armed subject who drove a vehicle at officers, a subject who had dropped the weapon before the fatal sequence, or a subject killed by a less-lethal deployment rather than gunfire. One further case in which the discharge was unintentional was also removed.
Final analytic sample: 1,970 records.
Operational definition
An encounter qualifies if the decedent’s conduct with an edged or improvised sharp weapon — not any other weapon also present — precipitated the first police firearm discharge.
| Situation | Rule |
|---|---|
| Edged weapon + firearm both present | Retained if edged-weapon conduct precipitated the shooting; excluded if firearm conduct did |
| Vehicle also involved | Excluded if the decedent’s use of the vehicle precipitated the shooting, regardless of edged weapon present |
| Subject complied or surrendered | Excluded if the weapon was dropped or surrendered before the fatal sequence began |
Exclusion criteria
A case is excluded if any of the following applies:
- The decedent was unarmed
- The decedent was armed exclusively with a non-edged weapon
- The decedent’s use of a vehicle, not the edged weapon, precipitated the shooting
- The decedent had dropped or surrendered the weapon before the fatal sequence
- The decedent was killed by a less-lethal deployment rather than a firearm discharge
- The discharge was accidental or unintentional
- The encounter involved an off-duty officer acting in a personal capacity rather than a law enforcement one
Three pairs of same-date, same-agency incidents
Three pairs of records in the dataset share a date and agency but involve separate decedents at distinct encounters. These were retained as separate records after individual verification.
Snapshots and versioning
The dataset is versioned. Each published report names the snapshot it draws on, and no snapshot is edited after publication. Changes across snapshots — additions, corrections, removals — are recorded in the version history.
References
Mapping Police Violence. (2026). Mapping Police Violence database [Data set]. Retrieved March 4, 2026, from https://mappingpoliceviolence.org
Washington Post. (2025). Fatal Force database [Data set]. Retrieved August 11, 2025, from https://github.com/washingtonpost/data-police-shootings
How to cite
Edged-Weapon Response Lab. (2026). Data sources and inclusion rules. In EWRL Methods Documentation (Version 1.0). https://droptheknife.org/methods/data-sources